Home | Articles | About | Contact | Forum |
Saturday, October 01, 2016



Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Mailing List

E-mail:
By Joining the mailing list you will be notified of site updates.


Show Your Support For
This Site By Donating:











Audience: All
Last Updated: 10/4/2011 6:23:28 PM
**All times are EST**





GFS vs. OCFS

By Erik Rodriguez

Tags: gfs, gfsv2, ocfs, ocfs performance problems

This articles provides information about the GFS and OCFS high performance file systems.

Introduction

There are many high performance file systems available for Linux. Among the most popular today are GFS and OCFS. GFS is known as the Red Hat Global File System. OCFS is known as the Oracle Cluster File System. Neither one is easy to setup, but once you get them going they generally run without a problem.

I have used both of these file systems in production environment and have seen good results with each. But how do you know which one to use? While I cannot give you a definitive answer or matrix to look at, I will say this; Evaluate the environment where this will be deployed very carefully. These file systems doing things much differently than you traditional NFS or Samba systems. From personal experience, I have seen better performance in a read-heavy environment with OCFS. Remember this was developed primarily for databases, so a high number of read transactions combined with some writes will perform quickly and efficiently.



Again from personal experience, I have seen GFS out-perform OCFS in performance for write-intensive environments. In the webhosting world, we are generally concerned with data being read from drives, egress bandwidth, and network infrastructure. Every now and then you work on a system that is doing as much or more writing than reading. This is where GFS out-performs the other file systems.

I had OCFS running on an iSCSI mounted volume across 5 servers. When performance was taking a hit, the I/O times on the SAN went through the roof. I was able to solve the performance problem by switching to GFS. The only thing I didn't like about it was the need for fencing and a lock manager. You can read more about the GFS environment here. GFSv2 is now fully supported in CentOS.

Contact Us

If you found this information useful, click the +1 button



Your E-mail:


Subject:


Type verification image:
verification image, type it in the box

Message:


NOTE: this form DOES NOT e-mail this article, it sends feedback to the author.


TCP vs. UDP
Juniper SRX anti-spam filtering config
Windows Server 2008 Clustering Configuration
Windows 2008 R2 Network Load Balancing (NLB)
Extreme Networks: Downloading new software image
Juniper SRX save config to USB drive
Juniper SRX logout sessions
Extreme Networks Syslog Configuration
Command line drive mapping
Neoscale vs. Decru
Data Security vs. Data Protection
Juniper SRX Cluster Configuration
HOWTO - Create VLAN on Extreme Switch
Using a Non-local Colocation Facility
Linux Server Administration
IT Chop Shops
Flow Viewers: SFLOW, NetFLOW, and JFLOW
Exchange 2007 Back Pressure
IPtables open port for specific IP
Politics in IT Departments
HOWTO - Block Dropbox
Cisco IOS Cheat Sheet
Subnet Cheat Sheet
Design a DMZ Network
How DNS works
Firewall Configuration
Juniper SSG Firewalls
Server Management
Configuring VLANs
Runlevels in Linux
Server Clustering
SONET Networks
The Red Hat Network
Server Colocation
Complicated Linux Servers
Dark Fiber
Data Center Network Design
Firewall Types
Colocation Bandwidth






Copyright © 2002-2016 Skullbox.Net All Rights Reserved.
A division of Orlando Tech Works, LLC
By using this site you agree to its Terms and Conditions.
Contact Erik Rodriguez