Home | Articles | About | Contact | Forum |
Saturday, October 01, 2016



Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Mailing List

E-mail:
By Joining the mailing list you will be notified of site updates.


Show Your Support For
This Site By Donating:











Audience: Everyone
Last Updated: 8/23/2012 11:09:18 PM
**All times are EST**





Neoscale vs. Decru Encryption Vendors

By Erik Rodriguez

Tags: Neoscale vs. Decru, Decru datafort, cryptostore, deep encryption hardware, SAN encryption hardware

This article provides information on two vendors that were in a race to create "deep encryption" data storage technology.



What is deep encryption?

If you do enough consulting with large companies eventually you will find a deep encryption appliance. These devices were designed attach to a network and/or SAN as a utility device for encryption. Most of the need for such a device came from DoD/government regulations for secure data storage. Most of these devices (if not all) have been removed from production. Continue reading to find out why.

Neoscale vs. Decru

Both companies were in a race to develop the technology and then be acquired by another company. Both Neoscale and Decru were start ups with little operating capital and neither had the resources to bring their products directly to customers. In the end, Decru was bought by Netapp while Neoscale was bought by nCipher.

Shortly after the acquisitions, neither product line was further sold or supported. Netapp wanted to use some of the technology to add features to their current products. The same idea was used by nCipher, but neither of the companies were able to reap the benefits of their investments. Netapp flat out refuses to support any Decru hardware currently in operation and does not offer the device for sale.

Why did these products flop?

The answer is simple, they were literally data destruction devices. Both appliances had reputations for disaster. I personally heard stories of these devices destroying data because the decryption features failed and by design, there was no way to return the data to a usable state. Both Neoscale and Decrue offered these appliances for 5-figures! As I said earlier, mostly aimed at DoD and government with deep pockets.

Bottom line, if you ever run into one of these things or are asked to work with one, RUN THE OTHER WAY!



Contact Us

If you found this information useful, click the +1 button



Your E-mail:


Subject:


Type verification image:
verification image, type it in the box

Message:


NOTE: this form DOES NOT e-mail this article, it sends feedback to the author.


TCP vs. UDP
Juniper SRX anti-spam filtering config
Windows Server 2008 Clustering Configuration
Windows 2008 R2 Network Load Balancing (NLB)
Extreme Networks: Downloading new software image
Juniper SRX save config to USB drive
Juniper SRX logout sessions
Extreme Networks Syslog Configuration
Command line drive mapping
Neoscale vs. Decru
Data Security vs. Data Protection
Juniper SRX Cluster Configuration
HOWTO - Create VLAN on Extreme Switch
Using a Non-local Colocation Facility
Linux Server Administration
IT Chop Shops
Flow Viewers: SFLOW, NetFLOW, and JFLOW
Exchange 2007 Back Pressure
IPtables open port for specific IP
Politics in IT Departments
HOWTO - Block Dropbox
Cisco IOS Cheat Sheet
Subnet Cheat Sheet
Design a DMZ Network
How DNS works
Firewall Configuration
Juniper SSG Firewalls
Server Management
Configuring VLANs
Runlevels in Linux
Server Clustering
SONET Networks
The Red Hat Network
Server Colocation
Complicated Linux Servers
Dark Fiber
Data Center Network Design
Firewall Types
Colocation Bandwidth






Copyright © 2002-2016 Skullbox.Net All Rights Reserved.
A division of Orlando Tech Works, LLC
By using this site you agree to its Terms and Conditions.
Contact Erik Rodriguez